Metric spaces and complex analysis paper 2019

 
    1. Let $(X, d)$ be a metric space, and $Ο†$ be a non-decreasing function on $[0, ∞)$ such that $Ο†(0)=0, Ο†(t)>0$ for $t>0, Ο†$ is continuous at 0, and $Ο†(s+t)β©½Ο†(s)+Ο†(t)$ for all $s, tβ©Ύ0$. Define $ρ(x, y)=Ο†(d(x, y))$ for $x, y ∈ X$.
      1. Show that $ρ$ is a metric on $X$.
      2. Show that $x_{n} β†’ x$ in $(X, d)$ implies that $x_{n} β†’ x$ in $(X, ρ)$. Is the converse also true? That is, if $x_{n} β†’ x$ in $(X, ρ)$, is it true that $x_{n} β†’ x$ in $(X, d)$ too? Justify your answer.
      3. Show that there is a bounded metric $d'$ on $X$ which is equivalent to $d$ in the sense that $d\left(x_{n}, x\right) β†’ 0$ if and only if $d'\left(x_{n}, x\right) β†’ 0$ as $n β†’ ∞$
    2. Let $A$ and $B$ be two subsets of a metric space $X$. Show that $\bar{A} βˆͺ \bar{B}=\overline{A βˆͺ B}$, where $\bar{A}$ denotes the closure of a subset $A$. Is it true that $\overline{A ∩ B}=\bar{A} ∩ \bar{B}$ ?
      Give an example of subsets $A$ and $B$ of $ℝ$, such that $A ∩ \bar{B}$ and $\bar{A} ∩ B$, are different.
    3. Let $(X, d)$ be a metric space.
      1. What does it mean that $f: X β†’ X$ is a contraction? State the Contraction Mapping Theorem.
      2. Suppose $(X, d)$ is compact and non-empty, and $g: X β†’ X$ is mapping such that $d(g(x), g(y))<d(x, y)$ for any $x, y ∈ X, x β‰  y$. Show that there is a unique $x_{0} ∈ X$ such that $g\left(x_{0}\right)=x_{0}$.
    4. Let $Y$ be the vector space of all convergent real sequences $a=\left(a_{n}\right)_{nβ©Ύ0}$ with $\lim_{n β†’ ∞} a_{n}=0$, equipped with the norm $β€–aβ€–=\sup_{nβ©Ύ0}\left|a_{n}\right|$. Let $d(a, b)=β€–a-bβ€–$ for $a=\left(a_{n}\right)_{nβ©Ύ0} ∈ Y$ and $b=\left(b_{n}\right)_{nβ©Ύ0} ∈ Y$, where $a-b$ is the sequence $\left(a_{n}-b_{n}\right)_{nβ©Ύ0}$. You may assume that $d$ is a metric on $Y$.
      Let $B=\{a ∈ Y:β€–aβ€–β©½1\}$ be the closed unit ball of $Y$. Consider the mapping $F: B β†’ Y$ defined as the following. If $a=\left(a_{n}\right)_{nβ©Ύ0} ∈ B$ then $F(a)=\left(ΞΎ_{n}\right)_{nβ©Ύ0}$ is given by$$ ΞΎ_{0}=\frac12(1+β€–aβ€–),   ΞΎ_{n}=a_{n-1}\left(1-\frac1{2^{n}}\right) \text { for } nβ©Ύ1 .$$Show that $F$ maps $B$ into $B$, and moreover show that$$ d(F(a), F(b))<d(a, b)$$for any $a, b ∈ B, a β‰  b$. Prove that the equation $F(a)=a$ has no solution in $B$.
      Is the closed unit ball $B$ compact? Justify your answer.
      [Hint: you may use the fact, without proof, that the sequence $\prod_{k=1}^{n}\left(1-2^{-k}\right)$ converges to a positive number as $n β†’ ∞$.]
    1. What does it mean that a metric space $X$ is connected? What does it mean that $X$ is path-connected?
      1. From the definition, show that a metric space $X$ is connected if and only if any continuous function $f$ from $X$ to the two point discrete space $\{0,1\}$ is constant.
      2. Show that $X βŠ† ℝ$ is connected if and only if $X$ is an interval $J$.
        [You may use the Intermediate Value Theorem for real continuous functions, as long as you state it clearly. You may also use the fact that $J βŠ† ℝ$ is an interval if and only if for every $x, y ∈ J$ and $xβ©½y$, then $(x, y) βŠ† J$. In particular an interval can be unbounded.]
      3. Show that a path-connected space must be connected.
    2. Let $X$ be an open and connected subset of Euclidean space $ℝ^{n}$. Show that $X$ is path-connected.
    3. Show that there is no homeomorphism between $[0,1]$ and the unit circle $S^1=\{z ∈ β„‚:{|z|}=1\}$. Find a map which sends $[0,1]$ one-to-one and onto $S^1$.
  1. Let $D$ be an open subset of $β„‚$, and $f$ be a complex function on $D$. Let $z=x+y i$ where $(x, y)$ are real coordinates, and write $f(z)=u(x, y)+v(x, y) i$ for $z=x+y i ∈ D$, where $u$ and $v$ are real functions in $D$.
      1. What does it mean that $f$ is holomorphic in $D$ ?
      2. State the Cauchy-Riemann equations. Prove that if $f$ is holomorphic in $D$, then $u, v$ are solutions to the Cauchy-Riemann equations.
      3. Show that if $D$ is connected and if $f$ is real and holomorphic then $f$ is constant.
      1. Suppose now $f$ is holomorphic in $D$ and $a ∈ D$. State Taylor's expansion for $f$ about $a$, and the Cauchy integral formula for $f$ at $a$.
      2. Show that if $f$ is holomorphic and bounded on the complex plane $β„‚$, then $f$ is constant. [If you use Liouville's theorem, then you need to state it and prove it.]
      1. Let $a ∈ β„‚$. What does it mean to say that $a$ is an isolated singularity of $f$ ? What does it mean that $a$ is a removable singularity of $f$ ?
      2. Suppose that $b$ is an isolated singularity of $f$, state Laurent's expansion for $f$ about $b$.
      3. Show that if $f$ is bounded near $b$, then $b$ is removable.Riemann Removable Singularities Theorem
      4. Suppose now $f$ is holomorphic on $β„‚$, and $|f(z)| β©½|\sin z+\cos z|$ for every $z ∈ β„‚$. Show that $f(z)=A(\sin z+\cos z)$ for all $z ∈ β„‚$, where $A$ is a constant.
    1. Let $R$ be a connected and open subset of $β„‚$, and $f$ be holomorphic in $R$.
      1. Consider$$ A=\left\{z ∈ R: f^{(n)}(z)=0 \text { for all } n=0,1,2, β‹―\right\}$$Show that $A$ is open. Show that $A$ is closed too. Hence, or otherwise, prove that $A$ is empty or $A=R$.
      2. State and prove the Identity Theorem for holomorphic functions.
    2. Is there a holomorphic function $f$ in $D=\{z:|z|<1\}$ such that
      1. $f\left(\frac1{n}\right)=(-1)^{n}+1$ for $n=2,3, β‹―$ ? Justify your answer.
      2. $f\left(\frac1{n}\right)=\frac{n}{n+1}$ for $n=2,3, β‹―$ ? Justify your answer.
      3. $f\left(\frac{n-1}{n}\right)=1-\frac2{n}+\frac1{n^2}$ for $n=1,2, β‹― ?$ Is such $f$ unique? Justify your answer.
    3. Let $a ∈ β„‚$, and $f$ be a holomorphic function near $a$ so that $a$ is an isolated singularity of $f$.
      1. Define the residue $\operatorname{Res}(f, a)$ of $f$ at the isolated singularity $a$. What does it mean that $a$ is an essential singularity of $f$?
        In the following parts (ii) and (iii), suppose $a$ is an essential singularity of $f$.
      2. Show that for any $Ξ΄>0$ and $M>0$, there is $z ∈ β„‚$ such that $|z-a|<Ξ΄$ and $|f(z)|>M$. That is, $f$ is unbounded near $a$.
      3. Show that for any $Ξ΅>0, Ξ΄>0$ and any complex number $C$, there is a point $z ∈ β„‚$ such that $|z-a|<Ξ΄$ and $|f(z)-C|<Ξ΅$.
        [Taylor's expansion and Laurent's expansion may be applied as long as you state them clearly.]
    1. State the Residue Theorem, and show that$$ ∫_{0}^{2 Ο€} \frac{d ΞΈ}{1-2 p \cos ΞΈ+p^2}=\frac{2 Ο€}{1-p^2}$$where $p ∈ β„‚$ such that ${|p|}<1$.
    2. Define a holomorphic branch of $\log z$, and use a suitable contour integral to compute the integral$$ ∫_{0}^∞ \frac{\ln^2 x}{1+x^2} d x$$Justify your computations.
    3. Suppose $f$ is holomorphic in an open set $R$ containing $\{z ∈ β„‚:{|z|}β©½1\}$. Let $C(0,1)$ be the unit circle $\{z ∈ β„‚:|z|=1\}$ with the anti-clockwise orientation, and $D(0,1)$ be the unit disk $\{z ∈ β„‚:|z|<1\}$.
      1. Suppose $f$ does not equal zero identically in $D(0,1)$, and suppose $a ∈ D(0,1)$ is a zero of $f$, show that $f(z)=(z-a)^{m} g(z)$ for some $mβ©Ύ1$ ($m$ is called the order of zero $a$) and for some holomorphic function $g$ on $D(a, r)$ for some $r>0$, and $g(z) β‰  0$ for $z$ near $a$.
        Hence, or otherwise, deduce that $a$ is a simple pole of $\frac{f'(z)}{f(z)}$, if $f$ does not equal zero identically.
      2. Suppose now that $f$ possesses finitely many zeros $a_{i} ∈ D(0,1)$ of order $m_{i}$, where $i=1, β‹―, k$, and $Ο•$ is a holomorphic function in $R$. Show that$$ \frac1{2 Ο€ i} ∫_{C(0,1)} Ο•(z) \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} d z=\sum_{i=1}^{k} m_{i} Ο•\left(a_{i}\right) . $$
  2. Let $H=\{z: \operatorname{Im} z>0\}$ and $D=\{z:|z|<1\}$ the unit disk.
    1. Let $a ∈ H$. Find a Mâbius transformation $h$ which maps $H$ one-to-one and onto the unit disk $D$, such that $h(a)=0$, and find a one-to-one conformal map which sends $D$ onto $H$.
    2. Show that the MΓΆbius transformation $Ο†: z β†’ \frac{z-Ξ±}{1-\bar{Ξ±} z}$ maps $D$ one-to-one and onto $D$ for every $Ξ± ∈ D$. What is the image $Ο†(D)$ in the case where $|Ξ±|>1$ ?
    3. Let $R=\{z:|z|<1$ and $\operatorname{Im} z>0\}$. Find a conformal map which sends $R$ one-to-one and onto the unit disk $D$.

Solution

      1. Since $Ο† β‰₯ 0$, so $ρ(x, y)=Ο†(d(x, y)) β‰₯ 0$. Since $d(x, y)=d(y, x)$ $$ ρ(x, y)=Ο†(d(x, y))=Ο†(d(y, x))=ρ(y, x) $$ By assumption, $Ο†(t)=0$ only when $t=0$, hence $ρ(x, y)=Ο†(d(x, y))=0$ implies that $d(x, y)=0$, so that $x=y$ as $d$ is a metric. Finally verify that $ρ$ also satisfies the triangle inequality. If $x, y$ and $z$ in $X$, we have $d(x, z)≀d(x, y)+d(y, z)$, so that, by using the assumptions on $Ο†$ we have \begin{aligned} ρ(x, z) &=Ο†(d(x, z))\\&≀φ(d(x, y)+d(y, z))\\&≀φ(d(x, y))+Ο†(d(y, z)) \\ &=ρ(x, y)+ρ(y, z) . \end{aligned} Therefore $ρ$ is a metric on $X$.
      2. Suppose $x_n β†’ x$ in $(X, d)$, i.e. $d\left(x_n, x\right) β†’ 0$, since $Ο†$ is (right) continuous at 0, $Ο†\left(d\left(x_n, x\right)\right) β†’ 0$, that is, $ρ\left(x_n, x\right) β†’ 0$.
        The converse is also true, we may argue by contradiction. Suppose $ρ\left(x_n, x\right) β†’ 0$ but $d\left(x_n, x\right)$ does not tend to zero, thus there is $Ξ΅>0$ and there is a sub-sequence $\left\{x_{n_k}\right\}$ such that $d\left(x_{n_k}, x\right) β‰₯ Ξ΅$, $Ο†$ is non-decreasing implies that $ρ\left(x_{n_k}, x\right) β‰₯ Ο†(Ξ΅)>0$ for all $k$, which is a contradiction.
      3. We may choose $Ο†(t)=\frac{t}{1+t}$ and $ρ(x, y)=Ο†(d(x, y))$.
        Then $Ο†$ is increasing on $[0, ∞)$ and $Ο†(t)=0$ only for $t=0$. $Ο†$ is continuous at 0, and $$ \frac{t+s}{1+t+s}=\frac{t}{1+t+s}+\frac{s}{1+s+t}≀\frac{t}{1+t}+\frac{s}{1+s} $$ for all $s, t β‰₯ 0$, that is, $Ο†(s+t)≀φ(s)+Ο†(t)$. Therefore, by a) and b), $d'=ρ$ is a metric equivalent to $d$. While $d'(x, y)≀1$ for all $x, y ∈ X$.
    1. Since $A βŠ† \overline{A βˆͺ B}$ so $\bar{A} βŠ† \overline{A βˆͺ B}$ and similarly $\bar{B} βŠ† \overline{A βˆͺ B}$. On the other hand $A βˆͺ B βŠ† \bar{A} βˆͺ \bar{B}$ and $\bar{A} βˆͺ \bar{B}$ is closed, we therefore have $\overline{A βˆͺ B} βŠ† \bar{A} βˆͺ \bar{B}$. Hence $\bar{A} βˆͺ \bar{B}=\overline{A βˆͺ B}$.
      In general $\overline{A ∩ B}=\bar{A} ∩ \bar{B}$ is false, for example $A=β„š$ and $B=β„βˆ– β„š$. Then $A ∩ B=βˆ…$ but $\bar{A}=\bar{B}=ℝ$. Moreover $A ∩ \bar{B}=β„š, \bar{A} ∩ B=β„βˆ– β„š, \overline{A ∩ B}=βˆ…$ and $\bar{A} ∩ \bar{B}=ℝ$ are different.
      1. $f: X β†’ X$ is a contraction if there is a constant $0≀c<1$ such that $d(f(x), f(y))≀c d(x, y)$ for every $x, y ∈ X$. The Contraction Mapping Theorem says that if $f: X β†’ X$ is a contraction on a complete metric space $(X, d)$, then $f$ has a unique point, i.e. there is a unique $x ∈ X$, such that $f(x)=x$.
      2. Let us consider the function $F(x)=d(g(x), x)$ for $x ∈ X$. Then \begin{aligned} |F(x)-F(y)| &=|d(g(x), x)-d(g(y), y)| \\ &=|d(g(x), x)-d(x, g(y))+d(x, g(y))-d(g(y), y)| \\ &≀d(g(x), g(y))+d(x, y) \\ &≀2 d(x, y) \end{aligned} for all $x, y$, hence $F$ is continuous on $X$. Since $X$ is compact, $F$ achieves its minimum on $X$, that is, there is $x_0 ∈ X$, such that $$ d\left(g\left(x_0\right), x_0\right)=\inf_{x ∈ X} d(g(x), x) $$ If $g\left(x_0\right) β‰  x_0$, then $d\left(g^2\left(x_0\right), g\left(x_0\right)\right)<F\left(x_0\right)$ by assumption, so that $F\left(g\left(x_0\right)\right)<F\left(x_0\right)$ which contradicts to the claim $x_0$ is the inf of $F$. Thus $x_0$ must be a fixed point of $g$.
    2. Suppose $a ∈ B$, then $F(a)=ΞΎ=\left(ΞΎ_n\right)$ given in the question possesses the following properties: $$ ΞΎ_n=a_{n-1}\left(1-\frac1{2^n}\right) β†’ 0   \text { as } n β†’ ∞ $$ and $$ \left|ΞΎ_0\right|=\frac12(1+β€–aβ€–)<1 $$ While for $n β‰₯ 1$ we have $$ \left|ΞΎ_n\right|=\left|a_{n-1}\right|\left(1-\frac1{2^n}\right) ≀\left|a_{n-1}\right| ≀‖aβ€– $$ so by definition $‖ξ‖≀1$, and therefore $F(a) ∈ B$ for every $a ∈ B$.
      Suppose $a=\left(a_n\right), b=\left(b_n\right) ∈ B$, and let $ΞΎ=F(a)$ and $F(b)=Ξ·$. Then $ΞΎ_0-Ξ·_0=\frac12({β€–aβ€–}-{β€–bβ€–})$ and for $n β‰₯ 1$ $$ ΞΎ_n-Ξ·_n=\left(a_{n-1}-b_{n-1}\right)\left(1-\frac1{2^n}\right) $$ so that $$ \left|ΞΎ_0-Ξ·_0\right|≀\frac12β€–a-bβ€– $$ and for $n β‰₯ 1$ $$ \left|ΞΎ_n-Ξ·_n\right| ≀\left(1-\frac1{2^n}\right)\left|a_{n-1}-b_{n-1}\right| $$ If $a β‰  b$, then $β€–a-bβ€–>0$. Since $a_n-b_n β†’ 0$ so there is $N ∈ β„•,\left|a_{n-1}-b_{n-1}\right|≀\frac12β€–a-bβ€–$ for $n β‰₯ N$. Hence $$ \left|ΞΎ_n-Ξ·_n\right| ≀\left[\left(1-\frac1{2^N}\right) ∨ \frac12\right]β€–a-bβ€– $$ for all $n$, it follows that $$ β€–F(a)-F(b)β€– ≀\left[\left(1-\frac1{2^N}\right) ∨ \frac12\right]β€–a-bβ€–<β€–a-bβ€– $$ as long as $a β‰  b$.
      We are going to show that $F$ has no fixed point. Argue by contradiction. Suppose $a=F(a)$ where $a=\left(a_n\right) ∈ B$. Then, by definition of $F$ $$ a_0=\frac12(1+β€–aβ€–) $$ and $$ a_n=a_{n-1}\left(1-\frac1{2^n}\right) $$ for $n β‰₯ 1$. It follows that $$ a_n=\prod_{k=1}^n\left(1-\frac1{2^k}\right) a_0=\frac12(1+β€–aβ€–) \prod_{k=1}^n\left(1-\frac1{2^k}\right) $$ which does not converge to zero, a contradiction to the assumption that $a ∈ B$. By part (c), one can conclude that $B$ is not compact. [An argument by using unit vectors is also fine].
    1. $X$ is connected if $X=U βˆͺ V$ where $U, V$ are open and disjoint, then $U$ or $V$ is empty.
      $X$ is path-connected, if for every $x, y ∈ X$ there is a continuous mapping $γ$ from $[0,1]$ to $X$ such that $γ(0)=x$ and $γ(1)=y$.
      1. Suppose $f: X β†’\{0,1\}$ is continuous. Let $U=f^{-1}(0)$ and $V=f^{-1}(1)$. Then $U, V$ are open (also closed), disjoint and $X=U βˆͺ V$. If $X$ is connected, then $U$ or $V$ is empty, so $f(x)=0$ for all $x$, or $f(x)=1$ for all $x$, accordingly. Conversely, if $X$ is disconnected, so that $X=U βˆͺ V$ where $U, V$ are open disjoint and both are nonempty. Define $f(x)=0$ for $x ∈ U$, and $f(x)=1$ for $x ∈ V$. Then $f$ is continuous, and $f$ is not constant.
      2. Let us prove that $X βŠ† ℝ$ is connected if and only if $X=J$ is an interval. First prove any interval is connected. If $X$ is an interval with end points $a≀b$. If $a=b$ then $X=[a, a]=\{a\}$ which is connected. Otherwise we argue by contradiction. Suppose $f: X β†’\{0,1\}$ is continuous, so $f$ is also a continuous function from $X$ to $[0,1]$. If $f$ is not constant, then there are $x, y ∈ X$ such that $f(x)=0$ and $f(y)=1$. We may assume that $x<y$. Since $X$ is an interval, so that $[x, y] βŠ† X$ and $f$ is continuous on $[x, y]$. By IVT, there is $z ∈[x, y]$ such that $f(z)=1 / 2$, which is a contradiction.
        Conversely, assume that $X$ is connected, we show that $X$ is an interval, that is, if $x<y$ and $x, y ∈ X$, we need to show that $(x, y) βŠ† X$. Argue by contradiction. Suppose $c ∈(x, y)$ but $c βˆ‰ X$. Let $U=X ∩(-∞, c)$ and $V=X ∩(c, ∞)$. Then $U, V$ are open and disjoint, $x ∈ U, y ∈ V$, and $X=U βˆͺ V$ as $c βˆ‰ X$. Thus $X$ is disconnected, a contradiction.
      3. Suppose $X$ is path-connected, and we show that $X$ is connected. Again argue by contradiction. Suppose $X$ is disconnected, that is $X=U βˆͺ V$ where $U, V$ are open, disjoint and both non-empty. Let $x ∈ U$, and $y ∈ V$. Since $X$ is path-connected, so there is a continuous map $p:[0,1] β†’ X$ such that $p(0)=x$ and $p(1)=y$. Then $$ [0,1]=p^{-1}(U) βˆͺ p^{-1}(V) $$ where $p^{-1}(U), p^{-1}(V)$ are open, disjoint, and no one is empty, which would yield that the interval $[0,1]$ is disconnected, a contradiction.
    2. Suppose $X βŠ† ℝ^n$ is open and connected. Let $a ∈ X$ be any but fixed point, and let $A=\{x ∈ X: x$ can be connected to $a\}$, i.e. $A$ consists of all points $x ∈ X$, such that there is a continuous $p:[0,1]β†’X$ such that $p(0)=x$ and $p(1)=a$. We show that both $A$ and $A^c$ are open. Suppose $x ∈ A$, then also $x ∈ X$. Since $X$ is open in $ℝ^n$, so there is $r>0$, the open ball $B(x, r) βŠ† X$. Since any point $y ∈ B(x, r)$ can be connected to the center $x$ then to $a$, so that $B(x, r) βŠ† A$. Therefore $A$ is open. Similar argument shows that if $A^c$ were non-empty, then $A^c$ is open too. Since $X$ is connected, and $A$ is non-empty, so that $A=X$ which implies that $X$ is path-connected.
    3. Suppose there is 1-1 onto continuous $f:[0,1] β†’ S^1$, then $f$ maps disconnected space $[0, c) βˆͺ(c, 1]$ one to one and onto $S^1βˆ–\{a\}$ where $a=f(c)$, and $c ∈(0,1)$. Since $f$ and $f^{-1}$ are continuous, and $f^{-1}$ maps a connected space $S^1βˆ–\{a\}$ to a disconnected one, which produces a contradiction.
      Choose $a_n=\frac1{n}(n=1,2, β‹―)$. Let $f(x)=e^{i 2 Ο€ x}$ for $x ∈[0,1)$ but $x β‰  a_n$ for $n β‰₯ 1$ and $f\left(a_n\right)=e^{i 2 Ο€ a_{n+1}}$ for $n β‰₯ 1$.Hilbert's hotel
      1. $f$ is holomorphic in an open subset $D βŠ† β„‚$, if for every $z ∈ D$, the complex derivative $$ f'(z)=\lim_{h β†’ 0} \frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h} $$ exists for every $z ∈ D$.
      2. By letting $hβˆˆβ„$ go to zero, we obtain that, if $f=u+v i$ is holomorphic, $$ f'(z)=u_x+v_x i $$ and by letting $h=i Ξ΄$, where $Ξ΄βˆˆβ„$ and $Ξ΄ β†’ 0$, to obtain $$ f'(z)=\frac1{i}\left(u_y+v_y i\right) $$ and therefore $$ u_x+v_x i=\frac1{i}\left(u_y+v_y i\right) $$ which is equivalent to the Cauchy-Riemann equations: $$ u_x=v_y \text { and } u_y=-v_x $$
      3. If $f=u+v i$ is real, so that $v=0$, which implies $u_x=u_y=0$ too by Cauchy-Riemann equations. Hence $u$ is constant as $D$ is connected and open. It follows that $f$ is constant on $D$.
      1. Talyor's expansion: If $f$ is holomorphic in $D$, and suppose $r>0$ such that the disk $D(a, r) βŠ† D$, then $$ f(z)=\sum_{n=0}^∞ a_n(z-a)^n \text { for any } z ∈ D(a, r) $$ where $$ a_n=\frac1{n !} f^{(n)}(a)=\frac1{2 Ο€ i} ∫_{C(a, ρ)} \frac{f(w)}{(w-a)^{n+1}} d w $$ where $C(a, ρ)$ is the circle with center $a$ and radius $ρ$, as long as $0<ρ<r$.
      2. Suppose $f$ is bounded and holomorphic in $β„‚$, then $$ f(z)=\sum_{n=0}^∞ a_n z^n \text { for any } z $$ where $$ a_n=\frac1{2 Ο€ i} ∫_{C(0, R)} \frac{f(w)}{w^{n+1}} d w $$ Suppose $|f(z)|≀M$ for any $z ∈ β„‚$, where $M$ is a bound of $f$ in $β„‚$. Then, by the Estimation Lemma, \begin{aligned} \left|a_n\right| &≀\frac1{2 Ο€} 2 Ο€ R \max_{|w|=R}\left|\frac{f(w)}{w^{n+1}}\right|\\&=R \frac1{R^{n+1}} M \\ &=\frac1{R^n} M \end{aligned} for any $R>0$. Therefore, for $n β‰₯ 1$, by letting $R β†’ ∞$ we conclude that $\left|a_n\right|≀0$, so $a_n=0$ for all $n β‰₯ 1$, hence $f(z)=a_0$ is constant.
      1. It is said that $a$ is an isolated singularity of $f$, if there is $r>0, f$ is holomorphic on $D(a, r)βˆ–\{a\}$, where $D(a, r)βˆ–\{a\}=\{z: 0<|z-a|<r\}$.
        An isolated singularity is removable if there is a holomorphic function $g$ in $D(a, r)$ (for some $r>0$) such that $f=g$ on $D(a, r)βˆ–\{a\}$, that is, $f$ can be extended (uniquely) to a holomorphic function in $D(a, r)$.
      2. Laurent's expansion. If $b$ is an isolated singularity, so that there is $r>0$ such that $f$ is holomorphic in $D(b, r)βˆ–\{b\}$, and $$ f(z)=\sum_{n=1}^∞ c_{-n}(z-b)^{-n}+\sum_{n=0}^∞ c_n(z-b)^n=\sum_{n=-∞}^∞ c_n(z-b)^n \text { for any } 0<|z-b|<r $$ where $$ c_n=\frac1{2 Ο€ i} ∫_{C(b, ρ)} \frac{f(w)}{(w-b)^{n+1}} d w $$ for all $n ∈ β„€$, where $0<ρ<r$.
      3. Suppose $f$ is bounded on $D(b, r)βˆ–\{b\}$, say ${|f(z)|}≀M$ for any $0<{|z-b|}<r$. Then, by Estimation Lemma, \begin{aligned} \left|c_n\right| &≀\frac1{2 Ο€} 2 Ο€ ρ \max_{|w-b|=ρ}\left|\frac{f(w)}{(w-b)^{n+1}}\right|\\&=\frac1{2 Ο€} 2 Ο€ ρ \frac1{ρ^{n+1}} \max_{|w-b|=ρ}|f(w)| \\ &≀ρ^{-n} M \end{aligned} for any $n ∈ β„€$ and $0<ρ<r$. Letting $ρ ↓ 0$, then $ρ^{-n} β†’ 0$ if $-n>0$, so that $c_{-n}=0$ for $n=1,2, β‹―$. Therefore $$ f(z)=\sum_{n=0}^∞ c_n(z-b)^n \text { for } 0<|z-b|<r $$ The right-hand side defines a holomorphic function on $D(b, r)$, including $b$ too, so $b$ is removable.
      4. For the last part, we introduce $h(z)=\sin z+\cos z$ whose zeros are isolated. In fact $$ h(z)=\sqrt2 \sin \left(z+\frac{Ο€}{4}\right) $$ so its zeros are $a_n=n Ο€-\frac{Ο€}{4}$ where $n ∈ β„€$. Now consider $g(z)=f(z) / h(z)$ for $z β‰  a_n$, so that $a_n$ are isolated singularity of $g$. Now $|g(z)|≀1$ for all $z β‰  a_n$, thus $a_n$ are all removable, and therefore $g$ is (extended to be) holomorphic in $β„‚$, and still we have $|g(z)|≀1$, thus $g$ is bounded and holomorphic in $β„‚$, so that $g$ must be constant. It follows that $$ f(z)=A h(z)=A(\sin z+\cos z) $$ for a constant $A$, with $|A|≀1$
      1. We show that $A$ is open. Suppose $a ∈ R$, then there is $r>0$ such that $D(a, r) βŠ† R$, and according to Taylor's expansion $$ f(z)=\sum_{n=0}^∞ {f^{(n)}(a)\over n!}(z-a)^n \text { for }{|z-a|}<r $$ If $a ∈ A$, then all $f^{(n)}(a)=0$ so that $f(z)=0$ for $z ∈ D(a, r)$, and therefore $f^{(n)}(z)=0$ too for all $n β‰₯ 0$ and $z ∈ D(a, r)$. Therefore $A$ is open.
        On the other hand for each $n,\left\{z ∈ R: f^{(n)}(z)=0\right\}$ is the pre-image of $\{0\}$ under $f^{(n)}$ which is continuous, and therefore is closed. It follows that $$ A=\bigcap_{n=0}^∞\left\{z ∈ R: f^{(n)}(z)=0\right\} $$ is closed in $R$. Therefore $A$ is a closed and open subset of $R$. Since $R$ is connected, so that $A$ must be empty or $A=R$.
      2. Identity Theorem. Suppose $f$ is holomorphic on a connected open set $R βŠ† β„‚$, $a ∈ R$ and there is a sequence of $z_n ∈ Rβˆ–\{a\}, z_n β†’ a,f\left(z_n\right)=0$ for $n=1,2, β‹―$, then $f(z)=0$ for all $z ∈ R$.
        Proof. Let $A$ as defined above. By Taylor's expansion $$ f(z)=\sum_{n=0}^∞ a_n(z-a)^n \text { for }{|z-a|}<r $$ for some $r>0$. We claim that all $a_n=0$.
        Since $f(a)=\lim_{n β†’ ∞} f\left(z_n\right)=0$, so $a_0=0$.
        Suppose there is $k ∈ β„•$, such that $a_k β‰  0$, and $a_n=0$ for $n<k$, then $$ \frac{f(z)}{(z-a)^k}=a_k+a_{k+1}(z-a)^{k+1}+β‹― $$ for any $0<{|z-a|}<r$. In particular $$ 0=\frac{f\left(z_n\right)}{\left(z_n-a\right)^k}=a_k+a_{k+1}\left(z_n-a\right)^{k+1}+β‹― $$ so by letting $n β†’ ∞$ we obtain that $a_k=0$ which contradicts to the assumption. Therefore $f^{(k)}(a)=0$ for all $k$. Hence $a ∈ A$, thus $A$ is non-empty, so that $A=R$, which means that $f(z)=0$ for every $z ∈ R$.
      1. Since $\frac1{n} β†’ 0 ∈ D$, by Identity Theorem, $f(z)=2$ as $f\left(\frac1{2 n}\right)=2$, and also $f(z)=0$ as $f\left(\frac1{2 n+1}\right)=0$, for every $z ∈ D$. Therefore there is no such holomorphic function.
      2. $f(z)=\frac1{1+z}$ will do, which is unique.
      3. $f(z)=z^2$ will do, also $$ f(z)=z^2+\sin \frac{Ο€}{1-z} $$ works as well. Identity Theorem does not apply in this case as $\frac{n-1}{n} β†’ 1$, but 1 does not belong to the open unit disk $D(0,1)$.
      1. If $a$ is an isolated singularity for $f$, then there is $r>0$, we have Laurent's expansion about $a$ in the following form $$ f(z)=\sum_{n=1}^∞ c_{-n}(z-a)^{-n}+\sum_{n=1}^∞ c_n(z-a)^n \text { for } 0<|z-a|<r $$ here the coefficient $$ c_n=\frac1{2 Ο€ i} ∫_{C(a, ρ)} \frac{f(w)}{(w-a)^{n+1}} d w $$ where $0<ρ<r$. The coefficient of $(z-a)^{-1}$, that is, \begin{equation} c_{-1}=\frac1{2 Ο€ i} ∫_{C(a, ρ)} f(z) d z \end{equation} is called the residue of $f$ at $a$. [It is an acceptable answer that the residue of $f$ at $a$ is given by (1).] $a$ is essential if there are infinite many $c_{-n}($ where $n ∈ β„•$) do not vanish.
      2. Suppose ${|f(z)|}≀M$ for $n β‰₯ 1,0<ρ<Ξ΄$, we have by Estimation Lemma $$ \left|c_{-n}\right|≀\frac1{2 Ο€} 2 Ο€ ρ \max_{|w-a|=ρ}\left|\frac{f(w)}{(w-a)^{-n+1}}\right|≀ρ^n M $$ by letting $ρ ↓ 0$ we may conclude that all $c_{-n}$ vanish for $n=1,2, β‹―$, so $a$ is not essential by definition.
      3. For every complex number $C$, $a$ is an essential singularity of $f(z)-C$ too. If there is a sequence $z_n β†’ a$ such that $f\left(z_n\right)-C=0$, then we are done. Otherwise, there is $r>0$ such that $f(z)-C β‰  0$ has on $D(a, r)βˆ–\{a\}$ for some $r>0$. Now consider the function $h(z)=\frac1{f(z)-C}$ for $0<|z-a|<r$, so that $a$ is an isolated singularity. We show that $h$ is unbounded. Suppose $h$ is bounded, then $a$ is a removable singularity of $h$ so that $\lim_{z β†’ a} h(z)$ exists. If $h(z) β†’ 0$, then $a$ is a zero of $h$. Since $h$ is not identically equal to zero, so that $a$ is an isolated zero. Hence $h(z)=(z-a)^k g(z)$ where $g(z)$ is holomorphic, and has no zero in $|z-a|<r$ for some $r>0$. Hence $$ f(z)=C+\frac1{h(z)}=C+\frac1{(z-a)^k} \frac1{g(z)} $$ and therefore $a$ is a pole of order $k$, not an essential one, which is a contradiction. Hence $h(a) β‰  0$. In this case $h β‰  0$ is holomorphic in $D(a, r)$ for some $r>0$, hence $f(z)=C+\frac1{h(z)}$ is holomorphic up to $a$ too, thus $a$ is removable, a contradiction too.
        We therefore can conclude that $a$ is an essential singularity of $h$ too. In particular $h$ is unbounded, hence there is $z$ such that $0<|z-a|<Ξ΄$ but $|h(z)|>\frac1Ξ΅$, that is $|f(z)-C|<Ξ΅$.
    1. The Residue Theorem: Suppose that $U$ is an open set in β„‚ and $Ξ³$ is a path whose inside is contained in $U$, so that for all $zβˆ‰U$ we have $I(Ξ³, z) = 0$. Then if $S βŠ‚ U$ is a finite set such that $S ∩ Ξ³^* = βˆ…$ and $f$ is a holomorphic function on $Uβˆ–S$ we have $$ ∫_C f(z) d z=2 Ο€ i \sum_{a∈S} \operatorname{Res}(f, a) $$ Let’s do the substitution $z=e^{i ΞΈ}$ with $ΞΈ: 0 β†’ 2 Ο€$ in the integral on the left-hand side, which is denoted by $I$ for simplicity. Then $d ΞΈ=d z /(i z), \cos ΞΈ=\frac12\left(z+\frac1{z}\right)$ so that $I$ can be turned into the following contour integral \begin{aligned} I &=∫_{C(0,1)} \frac1{1-p\left(z+\frac1{z}\right)+p^2} \frac{d z}{i z} \\ &=\frac1{i} ∫_{C(0,1)} \frac1{z-p\left(z^2+1\right)+p^2 z} d z \\ &=\frac1{i} ∫_{C(0,1)} \frac1{(z-p)(1-p z)} d z \\ &=2 Ο€ \frac1{1-p p}=\frac{2 Ο€}{1-p^2} \end{aligned} where the last equality follows from the Cauchy formula applying to function $\frac1{1-p z}$ at point $p$, which is holomorphic in $D\left(0, \frac1{|p|}\right)$.
    2. Let $f(z)=\frac{\ln^2 z}{1+z^2}$ where $\ln z$ is a holomorphic branch to be chosen later. Set up contour as the following. Let $0<Ξ΅<R$ where $Ξ΅<1$ and $R>1$. The contour $Ξ“$ consists of the upper semi-circle $C_R$ with center zero and radius $R$, starting at $R$ to $-R$, which has a parameterization $z=R e^{i ΞΈ}, ΞΈ: 0 β†’ Ο€$ and $d z=i R e^{i ΞΈ} d ΞΈ$. The second part $Ξ“_2$ is the section along the real line $[-R,-Ξ΅]$, and the 3rd part $Ξ“_3$ is $[Ξ΅, R]$, both has parameterization $z=x$ and $d z=d x$. The last part is the small semi-circle $C_Ξ΅^-$ center at 0 with radius $Ξ΅$, with clock-wise orientation, so that it has parameterization $z=Ξ΅ e^{i t}$ where $t: Ο€ β†’ 0$, and $d z=i Ξ΅ e^{i t} d t$
      Choose a holomorphic branch $\ln z$ so that it is holomorphic inside the contour, so we may choose $$ \ln z=\ln |z|+i \arg z, \text { with }-\frac{Ο€}2<\arg z<\frac{3 Ο€}2 $$ Then $f$ has one simple pole $i$ inside the contour $Ξ“$, whose residue $$ \operatorname{Res}(f, i)=\left.\frac{\ln^2 z}{\left(1+z^2\right)'}\right|_{z=i}=\frac{\ln^2 i}{2 i}=\frac1{2 i}\left(\frac{Ο€}2 i\right)^2=-\frac1{2 Ο€ i} \frac{Ο€^3}{4} $$ so that by Residue Theorem $$ ∫_{Ξ“} f(z) d z=2 Ο€ i \operatorname{Res}(f, i)=-\frac{Ο€^3}{4} $$ On the other hand, \begin{align} \nonumber&∫_{Ξ“_2} f(z) d z+∫_{Ξ“_3} f(z) d z\\\nonumber&=∫_{-R}^{-Ξ΅} \frac{\ln^2 x}{1+x^2} d x+∫_Ξ΅^R \frac{\ln^2 x}{1+x^2} d x\\ &\nonumber=∫_{-R}^{-Ξ΅} \frac{(\ln |x|+i Ο€)^2}{1+x^2} d x+∫_Ξ΅^R \frac{\ln^2 x}{1+x^2} d x\\ &=2 Ο€ i ∫_Ξ΅^R \frac{\ln x}{1+x^2} d x-Ο€^2 ∫_Ξ΅^R \frac1{1+x^2} d x+2 ∫_Ξ΅^R \frac{\ln^2 x}{1+x^2} d x \end{align} While the path integral $$ ∫_{C_R} f(z) d z=∫_0^Ο€ \frac{(\ln R+i ΞΈ)^2}{1+R^2 e^{2 ΞΈ i}} i R e^{i ΞΈ} d ΞΈ $$ so that $$ \left|∫_{C_R} f(z) d z\right|≀π \frac{(\ln R+Ο€)^2}{R^2-1} R β†’ 0 \text { as } R ↑ ∞ $$ Similarly $$ ∫_{C_Ξ΅^-} f(z) d z=-∫_0^Ο€ \frac{(\ln Ξ΅+i t)^2}{1+Ξ΅^2 e^{2 t i}} i Ξ΅ e^{i t} d t $$ so that $$ \left|∫_{C_Ξ΅^-} f(z) d z\right|≀π \frac{(\ln Ξ΅+Ο€)^2}{1-Ξ΅^2} Ξ΅β†’ 0\text{ as }Ξ΅ ↓ 0 $$ Therefore by letting $Ξ΅ ↓ 0$ then by letting $R ↑ ∞$ in (2) to obtain $$ 2 Ο€ i ∫_0^∞ \frac{\ln x}{1+x^2} d x-Ο€^2 ∫_0^∞ \frac1{1+x^2} d x+2 ∫_0^∞ \frac{\ln^2 x}{1+x^2} d x=\lim_{\substack{R ↑ ∞\\Ξ΅ ↓ 0}} ∫_{Ξ“} f(z) d z=-\frac{Ο€^3}{4} $$ Therefore we must have, by comparing the real parts of two sides in the above equation, $$ -Ο€^2 ∫_0^∞ \frac1{1+x^2} d x+2 ∫_0^∞ \frac{\ln^2 x}{1+x^2} d x=-\frac{Ο€^3}{4} $$ so that $$ 2 ∫_0^∞ \frac{\ln^2 x}{1+x^2} d x=Ο€^2 ∫_0^∞ \frac1{1+x^2} d x-\frac{Ο€^3}{4}=Ο€^2 \frac{Ο€}2-\frac{Ο€^3}{4}=\frac{Ο€^3}{4} $$ and therefore $$ ∫_0^∞ \frac{\ln^2 x}{1+x^2} d x=\frac{Ο€^3}{8} $$
      1. By Taylor's expansion $$ f(z)=\sum_{n=0}^∞ a_n(z-a)^n $$ for all $z$ such that $|z-a|<r$, where $r>0$ is any such that $D(a, r) βŠ† D(0,1)$. If $f$ is not identically equal to zero, then not all $a_n=0$, thus, there is $m$ such that $a_m β‰  0$ but $a_l=0$ for any $l<m$. Hence $$ f(z)=(z-a)^m \sum_{n=k}^∞ a_k(z-a)^{n-m}=(z-a)^m g(z) $$ where $g(z)=\sum_{n=k}^∞ a_n(z-a)^{n-m}$ which is holomorphic and $g(a) β‰  0$. If $f$ is not identically equal to zero, then $a$ is an isolated zero, so that $a$ is an isolated singularity of $f' / f$. In fact, since $f'(z)=m(z-a)^{m-1} g(z)+(z-a)^m g'(z)$, so that \begin{aligned} \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} &=\frac{m(z-a)^{m-1} g(z)+(z-a)^m g'(z)}{(z-a)^m g(z)} \\ &=\frac{m}{z-a}+\frac{g'(z)}{g(z)} \end{aligned} Since $g(a) β‰  0$, so $g' / g$ is holomorphic near $a$, thus $a$ is a simple pole of $f' / f$.
      2. Similar to (i), if $a$ is a zero of $f$, then \begin{aligned} Ο•(z) \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} &=Ο•(z) \frac{m(z-a)^{m-1} g(z)+(z-a)^m g'(z)}{(z-a)^m g(z)} \\ &=\frac{m}{z-a} Ο•(z)+Ο•(z) \frac{g'(z)}{g(z)} . \end{aligned} Since $g(a) β‰  0$ and $g$ and $Ο•$ are holomorphic, so that $a$ is a simple pole of $Ο•(z) \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)}$, whose residue equals \begin{aligned} \lim_{z β†’ a}(z-a) Ο•(z) \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} &=\lim_{z β†’ a} m Ο•(z)+\lim_{z β†’ a}(z-a) Ο•(z) \frac{g'(z)}{g(z)} \\ &=m Ο•(a) . \end{aligned} Therefore, according to the Residue Theorem $$ \frac1{2 Ο€ i} ∫_{C(0,1)} Ο•(z) \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} d z=\sum_{i=1}^k \operatorname{Res}\left(Ο•(z) \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)}, a_i\right)=\sum_{i=1}^k m_i Ο•\left(a_i\right) $$ which completes the proof.
    1. By the basic properties of Mâbius transformations, if $h$ maps $H$ onto $D$, and sends $a$ to 0, then $h$ sends $\bar{a}$ to $∞$, so that $$ h(z)=e^{i θ} \frac{z-a}{z-\bar{a}} $$ where $θ$ is real. The inverse of $h$ maps $D$ onto $H$. To work out the inverse of $h$ explicitly. Let $w=h(z)$. Then $$ e^{-i θ} w=\frac{z-a}{z-\bar{a}} $$ solves $z$ to obtain $$ z=\frac{\bar{a} w-a e^{i θ}}{w-e^{i θ}} $$
    2. Let $w=Ο†(z)$, where $|Ξ±| β‰  1$. Then \begin{aligned} |w|^2-1 &=\frac{z-Ξ±}{1-\bar{Ξ±} z} \frac{\bar{z}-\bar{Ξ±}}{1-Ξ± \bar{z}}-1 \\ &=\frac{\left(1-|Ξ±|^2\right)\left(|z|^2-1\right)}{1-\bar{Ξ±} z-Ξ± \bar{z}+|Ξ±|^2|z|^2} \\ &=\frac{1-|Ξ±|^2}{|1-\bar{Ξ±} z|^2}\left(|z|^2-1\right) \end{aligned} so that, if $|Ξ±|<1$, then $|w|<1$ if and only if $|z|<1$. If $|Ξ±|>1$, then $|w|>1$ if and only if $|z|<1$. That is, if $|Ξ±|<1$, then $Ο†(D)=D$, and if $|Ξ±|>1$ then $Ο†(D)=D^c$.
    3. The circle $|z|=1$ intersects the real axis at $±1$, thus we first apply the Mâbius transformation $f_1$ which sends 1 to $0$, $-1$ to $∞$, that is $$ f_1(z)=\frac{z-1}{z+1} $$ Now $i$∈upper semi-circle $\{z:|z|=1,\operatorname{Im} z>0\}$, and $$ f_1(i)=\frac{i-1}{i+1}=\frac{(i-1)(-i+1)}2=i $$ so the unit circle is mapped to the imaginary axis.
      $0 ∈$real axis, and $f_1(0)=-1$, so $f_1$ maps the real axis to real axis.
      Choose a point say $i / 2$ inside the domain $R$. Since $$ f\left(\frac{i}2\right)=\frac{i-2}{i+2}=\frac{(i-2)(-i+2)}{5}=\frac{-3+4 i}{5} $$ we thus may conclude that $$ f_1(R)=\{z=x+i y: y>0, x<0\} $$ Let $f_2(z)=e^{-\frac{Ο€}2 i} z=-i z$, so that $$ f_2 ∘ f_1(R)=\{z=x+i y: y>0, x>0\} $$ and then apply $f_3(z)=z^2$, so that $$ f_3 ∘ f_2 ∘ f_1(z)=\left(-i \frac{z-1}{z+1}\right)^2=-\left(\frac{z-1}{z+1}\right)^2 $$ maps $R$ to $H$. Therefore, by part a) $$ f(z)=e^{i ΞΈ} \frac{-\left(\frac{z-1}{z+1}\right)^2-a}{-\left(\frac{z-1}{z+1}\right)^2-\bar{a}} $$ maps $R$ one-to-one onto the unit disk $D$, for arbitrary $ΞΈβˆˆβ„,a ∈ H$.