Rings and modules paper 2022
-
- Let $R$ be a commutative ring.
- Show that if $R$ is an integral domain with the ACCP then $R$ is a factorisation domain.
- We say that $x β R$ is irreducible if $β¨xβ©$ is maximal amongst proper principal ideals. State which of the following elements are irreducible in the given rings and briefly justify your answers:
$$
3+2 \sqrt{2} \text { in } β€[\sqrt{2}] ; β 25 \text { in } β€_{10} ; β 2 \text { in } β€[\sqrt{-5}]
$$
- Show that if $R$ is a PID then every non-unit in $R$ has an irreducible factor.
- Show that $R$ is a field if and only if 0 is irreducible.
- Let $\overline{β€}$ be the set of $Ξ± β β$ for which there is a monic polynomial $p β β€[X]$ such that $p(Ξ±)=0$.
- Show that $Ξ± β \overline{β€}$ if and only if the β€-module $β€[Ξ±]$ is finitely generated.
- Hence show that $\overline{β€}$ is a subring of $β$.
[Hint: you may assume that a submodule of a finitely generated module over a PID is also finitely generated.]
- Show that $\overline{β€}$ does not contain any irreducible elements.
-
- Show that if $R$ is an integral domain with non-zero characteristic $p$ then $p$ is prime and $R$ is a vector space over $π½_p$ in such a way that multiplication on $R$ is bilinear.
- Show that if $p$ is a prime and $R$ is a ring of order $p^2$ then either $R β
β€_{p^2}$ or there is a polynomial $q β π½_p[X]$ such that $R β
π½_p[X] /β¨qβ©$.
- Let $p β‘ 3\pmod4$ be prime.
- Show that if $d β π½_p$ is not a square then $d=-x^2$ for some $x β π½_p^*$.
- Show that if $q β π½_p[X]$ is a degree 2 irreducible polynomial then
$$
π½_p[X] /β¨qβ© β
π½_p[X] /\left\langle X^2+1\right\rangle
$$
-
- Show that if $R$ is a Euclidean domain then there is a prime $p β R$ such that if $q: RβR /β¨pβ©$ is the quotient map then $U(q(R))=q(U(R))$. [Hint: consider the minimal values of the Euclidean function.]
- Show that $A:=β[X, Y] /\left\langle X^2+Y^2+1\right\rangle$ is not a Euclidean domain. [You may assume that $U(A)=β^*$, and also that the β-vector space $A /β¨pβ©$ is finite-dimensional for any non-zero prime $p β A$.]Quotient of polynomials, PID but not Euclidean domain?
-
-
- Show that if $R$ is a Euclidean domain then every $A β M_{n, m}(R)$ is equivalent by elementary operations to a diagonal matrix.
- Show that if $R$ is a commutative ring and $A, B β M_{n, m}(R)$ are both in Smith Normal Form with $A$ equivalent to $B$ then $A_{i, i}$ is an associate of $B_{i, i}$ for all $i$. State clearly any results you use.
- Show that if $R=M_2(π½)$ for a field π½ and $R^n β
R^m$ as $R$-modules then $n=m$.
- Let $U, V$ and $W$ be vector spaces over π½ and let $R:=\operatorname{End}_{π½}(V)$.
- Show that the map $RΓL(U, V)βL(U, V)$ which sends $(Ο, Ο)$ to $Ο β Ο$ is well-defined and gives the commutative group $L(U, V)$ of π½-linear maps $UβV$ the structure of an $R$-module.
- Write down an $R$-linear isomorphism $Ξ±: L(U, V) β L(W, V)βL(U β W, V)$.
- Show that if $V=π½[X]$ considered as an π½-vector space, then $V$ is π½-linearly isomorphic to $V β V$.
- Deduce that $R β
R^2$ as $R$-modules.
Solution
-
-
- Write $β±$ for the set of elements in $R^*$ that have factorisation into irreducibles so that all units and irreducible elements are in $β± . β±$ is closed under multiplication, by design and since $R$ is an integral domain.
Were $β±$ not to be the whole of $R^*$ then there would be some $x_0 β R^* \backslash β±$. Now create a chain iteratively: at step $i$ suppose we have $x_i β R^* \backslash β±$. Since $x_i$ is not irreducible and not a unit there is $y_i|x_i$ with $y_i β 1$ and $y_i β x_i$; let $z_i β R^*$ be such that $x_i=y_i z_i$. If $z_i βΌ x_i$, then $z_i βΌ y_i z_i$ and by cancellation $1 βΌ y_i$, a contradiction. We conclude $y_i, z_i β x_i$.
Since $β±$ is closed under multiplication we cannot have both $y_i$ and $z_i$ in $β±$. Let $x_{i+1} β\left\{y_i, z_i\right\}$ such that $x_{i+1} β β±$; by design $x_{i+1}|x_i$ and $x_{i+1} β x_i$. This process produces a sequence $β¦|x_2| x_1|x_0$ in which $x_iβx_{i+1}$ for all $i β β_0$ contradicting the ACCP.
- $3+2 \sqrt{2}$ has $3-2 \sqrt{2}$ as a multiplicative inverse so is a unit in $β€[\sqrt{2}]$ and hence not irreducible.
$25 β‘ 5\pmod{10}$ and $β¨5β©=\{0,5\}$ is maximal amongst proper principal ideals in $β€_{10}$ and so irreducible.
2 is irreducible in $β€[\sqrt{-5}]$, since if $2=(a+b \sqrt{-5})(c+d \sqrt{-5})$ then $4=\left(a^2+5 b^2\right)\left(c^2+5 d^2\right)$ and so $b=d=0$, and hence $a= Β± 1$ or $c= Β± 1$.
- (In the notes we prove that a PID has the ACCP, so they may choose to reproduce that and then apply the first part.) Let $x β R \backslash U(R)$. Then $β¨xβ©$ is proper and so by Krull's Theorem it is contained in a maximal ideal $I$. Since $R$ is a PID $I=β¨dβ©$, and in particular $β¨dβ©$ is maximal amongst proper principal ideals so $d$ is irreducible, and since $x β I=β¨dβ©$ we have $d|x$ as required.
- If $R$ is a field then the only ideals are $\{0\}$ and $R$ and so $\{0\}$ is maximal amongst proper principal ideals, and hence 0 is irreducible.
On the other hand if $\{0\}$ is maximal amongst proper principal ideals and $x β R^*$ then $\{0\} ββ¨xβ©$ and so by maximality $β¨xβ©=R$. Since $R$ is commutative there must be $y β R$ such that $x y=1$, and again since $R$ is commutative it is a field.
-
- For the first part, 'only if' follows since $1, Ξ±, Ξ±^2, β¦$ generate $β€[Ξ±]$ as a β€-module, but the degree $d$, say, monic $p$ of which Ξ± is a root gives an inductive way of writing $Ξ±^i$ as a β€-linear combination of $1, Ξ±, β¦, Ξ±^{d-1}$ for $iβ©Ύd$.
For 'if', suppose that $p_1, β¦, p_k β β€[Ξ±]$ generate $β€[Ξ±]$ as a β€-module. Then $Ξ±^d$ is a β€-linear combination of $p_1, β¦, p_k$ for all $d β β_0$ and in particular for some $d>\max \left\{\deg p_1, β¦, \deg p_k\right\}$. This gives a monic satisfied by Ξ± as required.
- Suppose that $Ξ±, Ξ² β \overline{β€}$. Then there are generators $p_1, β¦, p_k β β€[Ξ±]$ and $q_1, β¦, q_m β β€[Ξ²]$. But $β€[Ξ±+Ξ²]$ and $β€[Ξ± Ξ²]$ are both contained in the β€-module generated by $Ξ±^i Ξ²^j$ for $i, j β β_0$, which in turn is generated by the finite set $\left\{p_i q_j: 1 β©½ i β©½ k, 1 β©½ j β©½ m\right\}$. Hence $β€[Ξ±+Ξ²]$ and $β€[Ξ± Ξ²]$ are submodules of a finitely generated β€-module, and so themselves finitely generated. Finally, $β€[Ξ±]=β€[-Ξ±]$ and 1 is a root of $X-1$ and so $\overline{β€}$ is a ring by the subring test.
- If $Ξ± β \overline{β€}^*$ is irreducible, then Ξ± is a root of some monic $p(X)$, so $\sqrt{Ξ±}$ is a root of $p\left(X^2\right)$. Since Ξ± is irreducible, $Ξ±β1$, but since $Ξ±=\sqrt{Ξ±} \sqrt{Ξ±}$ we have $\sqrt{Ξ±} βΌ 1$ or $\sqrt{Ξ±} βΌ Ξ±$. If $\sqrt{Ξ±} βΌ 1$ then $Ξ± βΌ 1$, a contradiction; if $\sqrt{Ξ±} βΌ Ξ±$, then $\sqrt{Ξ±} βΌ 1$ again contradiction.
If 0 is irreducible, by a(iv) we conclude that $\overline{β€}$ is a field. However, 2 does not have an inverse in β€ since if $2 Ξ±=1$ and $p β β€[X]$ is a monic then\begin{align*}2^d p(Ξ±)&=(2 Ξ±)^d+2 q(2 Ξ±)\text{ for some }q β β€[X]\\&=1+2 q(1)\text{ is odd integer}\end{align*}so $p(Ξ±) β 0$. Hence 0 is not irreducible.
-
- Let $Ο_R: β€βR$ be the unique homomorphism from the integers, and suppose that $R$ has characteristic $p$. If $p=a b$ for $a, bβ©Ύ1$ then $0_R=Ο_R(p)=Ο_R(a) Ο_R(b)$, and since $R$ is an integral domain we conclude that $Ο_R(a)=0$ or $Ο_R(b)=0$; say the former. Then by definition of characterstic, $aβ©Ύp$ and so $a=p$ and $b=1$. We conclude that $p$ is prime.
The kernel of $Ο_R$ contains $p$ and is an ideal in β€. Since β€ is a PID it has the form $β¨Nβ©$ for some $N β β_0$, but then $N|p$, whence $N=1$ or $N=p$. If $N=1$ then $1_R=Ο_R(1)=Ο_R(0)=0_R$ contradicting the non-triviality of $R$. We conclude that $N=p$ and the ring $β€ /β¨pβ©$ is the field $π½_p$ which is a field. By the First Isomorphism Theorem there is then an injective ring homomorphism $π½_pβR$ which induces an $π½_p$-vector space structure on the additive group of $R$ in such a way that right multiplication is π½-linear. Since multiplication is commutative, it is π½-bilinear.
- The additive order of 1 must divide $p^2$. It cannot be 1 since the ring is not trivial. If it is $p^2$ then $R β
β€_{p^2}$. The characteristic $p$ case is what remains. In this case $R$ is a vector space over $π½_p$, and for reasons of size must have a basis of size 2. Take $1 β R$ which is non-zero and extend this to an $π½_p$-basis by some element $x$. Let $a, b β π½_p$ be such that $x^2=a x+b$, then the map $π½_p[X]βR ; fβ¦f(x)$ is a surjective ring homomorphism. The kernel contains $\left\langle X^2-a X-b\right\rangle$, and since $π½_p[X] /\left\langle X^2-a X-b\right\rangle$ is 2-dimensional over $π½_p, R$ is 2-dimensional, and the given homomorphism is $π½_p$-linear.
-
- The map $π½_p^*βπ½_p^* ; xβ¦x^2$ is a homomorphism of the multiplicative group, and its image has index at most 2 since degree 2 polynomials over an integral domain have at most 2 roots, and at least 2 since $-1$ is not a square modulo $p$ for congruence reasons. Since cosets partition a group, if $Q$ are the quadratic residues in $π½_p^*$ then $-Q$ is the set of non-residues as required.
- Since $q$ is a quadratic there are $a, b, c β π½_p$ with $a β 0$ such that $q(X)=a X^2+b X+c$ by completing the square (since $p$ is odd) $q(X)=a\left((X-b / 2 a)^2+Ξ\right)$ for $Ξ=c-b^2 / 4 a^2$. Since $q$ is irreducible it has no root so $-Ξ$ is not a square, so by $\mathrm{c}(\mathrm{i})$ we have $Ξ=d^2$ for $d β 0$. Hence $q(X)=a d^2\left((X / d-b / 2 a d)^2+1\right)$. Dilating ideals by a unit does not change them so the map $π½_p[X] /β¨qβ©βπ½_p[X] /\left\langle X^2+1\right\rangle;Xβ¦d X+b / 2 a$ is an isomorphism.
-
- Let $f$ be a Euclidean function on $R$ and $p β R$ have $f(p)$ minimal over all nonzero non-units. Then if $x β R^* \backslash U(R)$, then either $p|x$ or there is $r β R^*$ with $x=b p+r$ and $f(r)< f(p)$. By minimality of $f(p)$ we have $r β U(R)$ and hence $x+β¨pβ© β U(q(R))$. It follows that $U(q(R)) β© q\left(R^* \backslash U(R)\right) β q(U(R))$, and hence $U(q(R)) β q(U(R))$. Units remain units under quotienting which is the other direction.
Finally, $p$ is prime, because it is not a unit, and if $p|x y$ and $pβx$ then by the above $p β£(b p+r) y$ for $r β U(R)$, but then $p|r y| y$ as required.
- Let $p$ be as in $\mathrm{d}(\mathrm{i})$. Then $A /β¨pβ©$ contains elements $x, y$ with $x^2+y^2+1=0$. It is also an integral domain that is finite dimensional over $β$ and so $A /β¨pβ©$ is a field and hence $A /β¨pβ©=U(A /β¨pβ©) βͺ\{0\}=β^* βͺ\{0\}=β$, but there are no $X, Y β β$ with $X^2+Y^2+1=0$.
-
-
- Let $π_k$ be those matrices $B βΌ_β° A$ with the additional property that whenever $i< k$ and $j β i$, or $j< k$ and $i β j$, we have $B_{i, j}=0$. We shall show by induction that $π_k$ is non-empty for $k β©½ \min \{m, n\} ; π_1$ contains $A$ and so is certainly non-empty.
Let $f$ be a Euclidean function for $R$, and suppose that $π_k β β
$ and $k<\min \{m, n\}$. Let $B β π_k$ be a matrix with $f\left(B_{k, k}\right)$ minimal. First we show that $B_{k, k}|B_{k, i}$ for all $i>k$ : if not, there is some $i>k$ with $B_{k, i}=q B_{k, k}+r$ with $f(r)< f\left(B_{k, k}\right)$ and we apply the elementary operations $c_iβ¦c_i-c_k q$ and $c_k β c_i$ to get a matrix $B'β π_k$ with $B_{k, k}'=B_{k, i}-q B_{k, k}=r$, but $f\left(B_{k, k}'\right)=f(r)< f\left(B_{k, k}\right)$ which contradicts the minimality in our choice of $B$. Similarly, but with row operations in place of column operations, $B_{k, k}|B_{i, k}$ for all $i>k$.
For $k< iβ©½ m$ let $q_i$ be such that $B_{k, i}=B_{k, k} q_i$. Apply elementary column operations $c_{k+1}β¦c_{k+1}-c_k q_{k+1}, β¦, c_mβ¦c_m-c_k q_m$ to get a matrix $B'$. For $k< iβ©½ n$ let $p_i$ be such that $B_{i, k}=p_i B_{k, k}$. Apply elementary row operations $r_{k+1}β¦r_{k+1}-p_{k+1} r_k, β¦, r_nβ¦r_n-p_n r_k$ to $B'$ to get a matrix $B^{\prime \prime}$. Then $B^{\prime \prime} βΌ_{β°} B'βΌ_{β°} B βΌ_{β°} A$ and $B^{\prime \prime} β π_{k+1}$. The inductive step is complete. It follows that $π_{\min \{m, n\}} β β
$; any $B$ in this set is diagonal and equivalent to $A$.
- This is on problem sheet 4. I am expecting them to quote the uniqueness theorem and the fact that equivalent matrices produce isomorphic presentations, so $R^m / \operatorname{Im} L_A β
R^m / \operatorname{Im} L_B$, and since both $A$ and $B$ are diagonal with, say, entries $a_1, β¦, a_k$ and $b_1, β¦, b_k$ (where $k=\min \{n, m\}$) we have $\operatorname{Im} L_A=\left\langle a_1\right\rangleΓβ―Γ\left\langle a_k\right\rangleΓ\{0\}Γβ―Γ\{0\}$ where there are $m-k$ copies of $\{0\}$. Moreover, $a_1|a_2|β―|a_k$ so $\left\langle a_1\right\rangle β β― β\left\langle a_k\right\rangle ββ¨0β© β β― ββ¨0β©$. Similarly for $\operatorname{Im} L_B$, and it follows by the uniqueness theorem that $a_i βΌ b_i$ for all $i$ as required.
- If $R=M_2(π½)$ then $R$ is $π½$-linearly isomorphic to $π½^4$, and if $R^n$ is $R$-linearly isomorphic to $R^m$ then the underlying $π½$-vector spaces are $π½$-linearly isomorphic, and so $π½^{4 n}$ is $π½$-linearly isomorphic to $π½^{4 m}$ and hence $4 n=4 m$ and so $n=m$.
-
- The map is well-defined because the composition of linear maps is linear. The multiplicative identity in $\operatorname{End}_{π½}(V)$ is the identity function and so $1_R β
Ο=Ο ; Ο β \operatorname{End}_{π½}(V)$ is additive and so $(Ο β
(Ο+Ο))(x)=Ο(Ο(x)+Ο(x))=Ο(Ο(x))+Ο(Ο(x))=(Ο . Ο)(x)+(Ο . Ο)(x)$ for all $x β V ;\left(\left(Ο+Ο'\right) . Ο\right)(x)=\left(Ο+Ο'\right)(Ο(x))=Ο(Ο(x))+Ο'(Ο(x))=(Ο β
Ο)(x)+\left(Ο'. Ο\right)(x)$ for all $x β V$; and finally $\left(Ο β Ο'\right) . Ο=\left(Ο β Ο'\right) β Ο=Ο β\left(Ο'β Ο\right)=Ο β
\left(Ο'. Ο\right)$ since functional composition is associative.
- In the first case, the map $Ξ±: L(U, V) β L(W, V)βL(U β W, V) ;(Ο, Ο)β¦(u+wβ¦Ο(u)+Ο(w))$ is a well-defined $R$-linear isomorphism.
- The map $Ξ²: π½[X] β π½[X]βπ½[X] ; pβ¦p\left(X^2\right)+q\left(X^2\right) X$ is an π½-linear bijection.
- Let $U=W=V$ in the isomorphism Ξ± and note that the map $RβR^2 ; Οβ¦Ξ±^{-1}(Ο β Ξ²)$ is well-defined and an $R$-linear bijection and the claim is proved.